<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lifting The Veil of Polygamy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/</link>
	<description>A discussion of differences and similarities between Mormonism and Evangelical Christianity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Divide? Maybe not so much &#8212; Part 2 &#124; Times &#38; Seasons, An Onymous Mormon Blog</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-11241</link>
		<dc:creator>Divide? Maybe not so much &#8212; Part 2 &#124; Times &#38; Seasons, An Onymous Mormon Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-11241</guid>
		<description>[...] than some evangelicals and Latter-day Saints think. An LDS commentator at Tim&#8217;s blog once stated that, &#8220;Only two can claim legitimate authority passed from one man to another as it was done in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than some evangelicals and Latter-day Saints think. An LDS commentator at Tim&#8217;s blog once stated that, &#8220;Only two can claim legitimate authority passed from one man to another as it was done in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kullervo</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4544</link>
		<dc:creator>Kullervo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 02:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4544</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I’m sure you would agree that by academic standards, the JD is hardly a reliable account.&lt;/i&gt;

Says who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I’m sure you would agree that by academic standards, the JD is hardly a reliable account.</i></p>
<p>Says who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frofreak</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4542</link>
		<dc:creator>frofreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4542</guid>
		<description>True enough.  But, and this is not meant as a defense of BY (I believe he really did teach or say many of the things he is purported to have), I&#039;m sure you would agree that by academic standards, the JD is hardly a reliable account.  I am not going to venture into where it is or isn&#039;t accurate, I really have no idea.

Though, at the very least, it gives us great insight into the minds of early church leaders and their evolving theology.

I think I just hijacked the thread...woops! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True enough.  But, and this is not meant as a defense of BY (I believe he really did teach or say many of the things he is purported to have), I&#8217;m sure you would agree that by academic standards, the JD is hardly a reliable account.  I am not going to venture into where it is or isn&#8217;t accurate, I really have no idea.</p>
<p>Though, at the very least, it gives us great insight into the minds of early church leaders and their evolving theology.</p>
<p>I think I just hijacked the thread&#8230;woops! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth R.</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 19:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4539</guid>
		<description>Very often I find that even the &quot;weird stuff&quot; Brigham said doesn&#039;t bother me all that much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very often I find that even the &#8220;weird stuff&#8221; Brigham said doesn&#8217;t bother me all that much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kullervo</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4537</link>
		<dc:creator>Kullervo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 18:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4537</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but BY said &lt;i&gt;tons&lt;/i&gt; of stuff like that.  Find a copy of the Journal of Discourses and flip through it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but BY said <i>tons</i> of stuff like that.  Find a copy of the Journal of Discourses and flip through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frofreak</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4534</link>
		<dc:creator>frofreak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4534</guid>
		<description>Well Tim, 

I believe that says something significant of your veiws on the infallability of prophets.  We probably don&#039;t jive on this issue, but it wouldn&#039;t be the first.

BTW, the phrasing may have been crass, but I by no means hold the veiw that somehow he was a fallen prophet, or anything like that.  It&#039;s just that not everything that ever came forth from his mouth was the word of God, and some far from it.  But this is really no different from prophets of old, don&#039;t you think?  One key difference is that the record is much more recent with BY, leaving him open to a higher level of scrutiny than Biblical prophets, and inevitably this humanizes him (with significant flaws and all) to a degree that I think we don&#039;t see with biblical prophets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Tim, </p>
<p>I believe that says something significant of your veiws on the infallability of prophets.  We probably don&#8217;t jive on this issue, but it wouldn&#8217;t be the first.</p>
<p>BTW, the phrasing may have been crass, but I by no means hold the veiw that somehow he was a fallen prophet, or anything like that.  It&#8217;s just that not everything that ever came forth from his mouth was the word of God, and some far from it.  But this is really no different from prophets of old, don&#8217;t you think?  One key difference is that the record is much more recent with BY, leaving him open to a higher level of scrutiny than Biblical prophets, and inevitably this humanizes him (with significant flaws and all) to a degree that I think we don&#8217;t see with biblical prophets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holdinator</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4532</link>
		<dc:creator>holdinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4532</guid>
		<description>I certainly don&#039;t hold chapter and section headings in the same regard as the scriptures themselves; but that being said, my comment was directed at the honesty, or lack thereof, in the treatment of the issues by Living Hope Ministries. Then again, honest examination of Mormonism has never been a strength of Living Hope Ministries. 

I also like how they showed the one woman talking about how in the FLDS tradition they didn&#039;t celebrate Christmas, but instead celebrated Joseph Smith&#039;s birthday, and then showed footage of the LDS church&#039;s celebration of Joseph Smith&#039;s 200th birthday at the Conference Center: leaving the wonderful impression that the LDS church must also consider Joseph Smith&#039;s birth much more important than Jesus&#039; birth (ignoring that every year the church holds a First Presidency Christmas Devotional at the Conference Center, and the celebration of Joseph&#039;s 200th birthday was a once in a century type thing).

Anyway, this thread has been interesting to say the least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly don&#8217;t hold chapter and section headings in the same regard as the scriptures themselves; but that being said, my comment was directed at the honesty, or lack thereof, in the treatment of the issues by Living Hope Ministries. Then again, honest examination of Mormonism has never been a strength of Living Hope Ministries. </p>
<p>I also like how they showed the one woman talking about how in the FLDS tradition they didn&#8217;t celebrate Christmas, but instead celebrated Joseph Smith&#8217;s birthday, and then showed footage of the LDS church&#8217;s celebration of Joseph Smith&#8217;s 200th birthday at the Conference Center: leaving the wonderful impression that the LDS church must also consider Joseph Smith&#8217;s birth much more important than Jesus&#8217; birth (ignoring that every year the church holds a First Presidency Christmas Devotional at the Conference Center, and the celebration of Joseph&#8217;s 200th birthday was a once in a century type thing).</p>
<p>Anyway, this thread has been interesting to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kullervo</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>Kullervo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>I believe that it&#039;s been said that chapter and section headings are scripture, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that it&#8217;s been said that chapter and section headings are scripture, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: holdinator</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>holdinator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>Just a brief comment on the film. I love how most of the &quot;quotes&quot; shown highlighted from D&amp;C 132 are from the section heading not the revelation itself. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a brief comment on the film. I love how most of the &#8220;quotes&#8221; shown highlighted from D&amp;C 132 are from the section heading not the revelation itself. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4529</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ldstalk.wordpress.com/2007/08/12/lifting-the-veil-of-polygamy/#comment-4529</guid>
		<description>to hear any Mormon say that about any former prophet is significant sound in my ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to hear any Mormon say that about any former prophet is significant sound in my ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
