A podcast I listen to about Christians solutions to poverty makes a big point on the tragedy of taking shortcuts. The implications of shortcuts were ringing in my ears as I listened to this Stand to Reason podcast about Charles Finney
Direct link here. Full episode here.
Charles Finney was a Presbyterian minister who was largely responsible for the Second Great Awakening, an American revival in the early 19th Century. He’s credited with inventing the modern day “altar call” and born-again experience. What most people don’t know is that Finney was largely influenced by Pelagius, a 4th Century monk and heretic, who didn’t believe in vicarious atonement or original sin. Finney sought to gather people around Jesus as merely a moral figure and make the church a moral reform society. Finney preached that “deeds not creeds” should be our focus to that end.
Probably the worst thing that came out of Finney’s revivals was the “get saved” mentality which sought out converts rather than disciples. It was Finney’s philosophy to do and say whatever necessary to get people to make a decision at that moment. Unfortunately that led to a rather shallow depth of faith for his converts. As other revivals came through the area people were switching back and forth between denominations based on the powerful calls to action the revival preachers offered rather than a rich understanding of the tenets of their faith.
Because of the intense revivalist battles the area eventually earned the name the “burned-over district“. It also became known as the psychic highway. It became a sort of past time in the area to have intense spiritual experiences and to create new religions around those experiences. Among those religions, Mormonism.
This podcast also has a great number of implications and insights into our recent discussion on liberal Christianity and “faithless” religion.

Awesome. I am looking forward to listening to this, but I have to wait until I’m home for the evening.
Yeah, the story of the burned-over district is an interesting one. It’s amazing how many religious movements came out of a relative small geographic area over just a few decades. And what some of the groups then taught makes early LDS polygamy sound pretty tame.
Tim said:
That reminds of the “baseball baptisms” of somewhat recent LDS history. That sort of thing doesn’t produce lasting growth except in the most unusual of circumstances.
For those who are tempted to think that Baptist=altar call, I’m told that Charles Spurgeon fought the ‘altar call’ methodology till his dying day, and refused to use it. A very passionate preacher, he considered the message itself the “call” and if THAT didn’t do it, then it wasn’t that person’s time… these methods were adopted at his church, I think, after Spurgeon’s death…. I’m sure Charles was looking on with some displeasure at that.
I try to extend grace and flexibility to ALL preachers, but to ask for “every eye to close, and every head bow….” still makes me GAG…..
GERMIT
Great post.
This “free will” “decision” theology is ( I believe) one of the worst problems the church faces.
Our ‘will’ is THE PROBLEM…not the solution.
Here is a recent sermon that deals with this exact topic, in a thoughtful and biblical way.
http://lightofthemaster.com/Sermons/Entries/2009/6/7_Trinity_Sunday_09.html
Be warned…you may never have heard anything like this before.
Thanks.
I would like to reproduce this post on my blog (with links to your blog) in the near future, if that would be alright with you.
Thanks for your consideration.
- Steve M.
sure thing Steve
Thanks a lot, Tim!
– Steve
It is now up on my blog.
Thanks again, Tim!
– Steve