I’ve heard Richard Dawkins say that he’s worried about the “fine-tuning” argument. Now apparently he concedes that there may be some credibility to Deism. I thought this article about a recent debate between the Oxford colleagues Richard Dawkinds and John Lennox was interesting.
If you’d like to see one of their debates, you can see it here. http://www.dawkinslennoxdebate.com/. I think the format of this particular debate is favored to Lennox’s side, but the content is interesting none-the-less. Perhaps of interest to our converstation is the discussion of whether or not evidence can support faith.